Love, Sex, Fear, Death: The Inside Story of the Process Church of the Final Judgment
A sober, sardonic recount of life in The Process. Flagellation optional.
Console your eyes; the Thetans throwing beaucoup bucks at the Dianetics funnel have come to level with us lowly, turning their best tricks toward inspirational--there is now a commercial for Scientology. Commercials for cults! It is a new day, people. In between some slick editing and some guy mouthlusting about my life-- "It's yours!” without a slink of irony--I thought I saw Thora Birch smiling back from my set. What? No. What? There is no Birch confirmation, but this is all to preface that right before I was to read Love, Sex, Fear, Death I was already in the mindset to wonder how one fumbles themselves into a cult.
Not so hard to wonder in the day of the glass-eyed empty drum of the Duggar clan and late-night MSNBC specials about juvenile vampiric sects. I regarded my copy of Love, Sex, Fear, Death with a wary eye in one socket. If you are verdant on your cult savvy, the book’s preface, written by Feral House’s own Adam Parfrey (who also pulls editorial duty), is of immense help. The Process Church of the Final Judgment was a highly controversial—and misunderstood—apocalyptic cult of the 1960’s. What started as a small group called Compulsions Analysis in London later exploded into a global empire with an ever-changing cash cow theology. With their uniformly black garb, coupled with their conflicting silver cross/Goat of Mendes accouterments, and penchant for producing massive amounts of boundary-pushing magazines (A Game of Rape, anyone?) a confused public immediately jumped to label them as a Satanic church. I fully expected the book—written mostly by a former member of The Process’s hierarchy, Timothy Wyllie—to be a full on kvetch about the trickery of cult leaders and their weak prey, lousing with naïveté--oh, the clutching of pearls!--but instead found a curiously open and frank confession of cult life that avoided an easy formula and instead focused on Wyllie's actualization considering, and in spite of, his experience with The Process. To write a simplistic review would surely be a disservice to the book's purpose, which is, essentially, to set the record straight and answer some questions. Aided by recounts from other members--neatly composed into separate chapters, for which I am grateful, dear editor--and over a hundred pages of images, clippings, and samples of The Process' lengthy magazine and editorial history, Love, Sex, Fear, Death leaves no stone unturned.
The biggest boulder (and with the most slippery of slopes, then) was the question of why. Why does a person, an intelligent person of 2 cells to rub, allow themselves to be Jonah'd and swallowed so easily by the whale? After reading Love, Sex, Fear, Death I think, in Wyllie’s case, the initial attraction was the pull of "extraordinary" as well as a sense of purpose and direction. As one of the original members, he was there for the initial inklings of Robert and Mary Ann de Grimston's conceptualized plan. As defectors from--aha!--the school of Scientology, the two utilized their former church's multi-purpose E-meter to hone in on people's insecurities and emotional triggers. This allowed for trauma and vulnerabilities to be smoothed and for an individual's true, subconscious goals to be found and voiced; Wyllie admits the sessions were "immensely clarifying and helpful” in terms of learning a person's reasons for and against achieving their personal goals. I call bullshit; it does not take a weatherman to look around, etc. but in Wyllie's almost sensuous retelling of the situation, the story, I can easily see how a young, intensely intelligent man of wandering direction could pick up and seize this. Later, The Process would stop using the E-meter, later called the P-Scope, in favor of themselves as ultimate empaths. That sense of camaraderie, gemütlichkeit, is intoxicating, and crucial for a cult.
With his retelling, the reader also gets a clear sense of why someone would stay in a cult, which Wyllie pointedly addresses, even after they've reached the point where the stem is off the apple. His vivid recollection of the cult's early time spent in an earnest, impoverished struggle and spiritual openness at the abandoned salt mine of Xtul in Yucatan, Mexico (after which seems to be the downfall of what Wyllie sees as the actual purpose of The Process) and of the physical, spiritual, and emotional work as one of the core members of The Process, he invested to the point of no return. He was one of the “elect,” as he puts it, hearkening back to that feeling of specialness; he was part of an extended family. When the church would later become clogged with power hungry subordinates, many of whom had not been so sacrificial and given so wholly to the spiritual work and abuse, he refused to leave as a determination that "they wouldn't break me."
And at this point I have to concede and say that while I appreciated Wyllie's honest, confessional style, the man doth protest too much in regards to the women. For a man involved in (and in many ways grateful for) a cult whose philosophy borrowed most closely from Alfred Adler, a man influential in the early support of feminism, there was much ado about woman hatin'. I get that there is some serious and justified resentment for Mary Ann, but some of what he says reads as a prayer against the power of the dowdy woman. There is little fault that Wyllie attributes to the supposed gullibility of Robert and himself, for that matter, when it comes to her and later in the bullying actions of chosen matriarchs.
Wyllie and his co-writers give great insight into the history of The Process (the Satanic and Manson murders connections are treated with an honest bewilderment) and while I can follow their tenuous connections (Christ said to love everyone...doesn't that naturally mean to love our most sworn enemy, Satan? Let's incorporate this into our deities chosen for I.R.S. purposes) I mostly appreciated the simplistic, wry personal recounts of the more sensational accusations, the bemused dispelling of myths and, of course, the large cache of Process publications.
Frank Zappa once said that the only difference between a cult and a religion is the amount of real estate they own; haven't the lights left the building? Cult of Personality, indeed.



Comments
They've been running that damn commercial non-stop on The Discovery Channel (during Mythbusters, ironically)and it enrages me to no end. Nice review.
So you know what I'm talking about! Thora Birch. That is what I'm saying. The lack of irony is disturbing, but not as disturbing as the fact that it airs a slew of times during Intervention/Obsessed. Et tu, Brute?
Nicely done, Tina.
Nice review. I haven't read this book, nor even heard of this particular sect before, but you make me a bit curious about it. I'm also curious about what motivated you to read it - what led you to consume the whole thing. Reflecting on the following:
I fully expected the book—written mostly by a former member of The Process’s hierarchy, Timothy Wyllie—to be a full on kvetch about the trickery of cult leaders and their weak prey... but instead found a curiously open and frank confession of cult life that avoided an easy formula.
It seems to me that a person with an easy, cynical view of religious cults - the view you present as your own at the outset - wouldn't likely invest the time to read a whole book about one. On the other hand, if you've had the cult experience from the inside - or you're very close to someone who has - then you're more prone to understand and experience the deeper perplexity that very bright, capable people do indeed get wrapped up in them. And that perplexity could lead one to a deeper inquiry.
I don't mean to get unduly personal, by any means, but I have to wonder if you really started out with that much clever, cynical distance from the cult phenomenon, and if so, what made you pursue this particular reading experience?
Regards,
VP
I have to agree with VP's comment, ... good call.
I don't see how having a cynical view on something is related to having an interest in the topic.
VP--first, thanks for reading the review; I hope you do read the book. I think that you did correctly pick up on a current of cynicism from the tone of my review. Yes. I think, however, that an intelligent person who is cynical of anything will want to educate themselves on that topic; this is my case, truly. While I have been in close proximity to cult activity (under the guise of Christian religion, and I do not embellish--google Bill Gothard. Verily, I speak) I really just wanted to understand the absurdity of it all, of the people who drink and "see the spider," as it were. What I found in this case was a truly heartfelt and honest explanation of things both banal and outrageous, and I think that is what I connected with most. I got why Wyllie joined, and why he stayed (which I made a great deal of emphasizing in my review as what I took from the book in the largest of sums) and the honesty was what shook me. I've no patience for the grandeur of Scientology and I think that dichotomy--the overly glamourous, slick Scientology commercial on television, juxtaposing this book where one man (and a few co-writers) get down to brass tax in the most confessional and no bullshit way was interesting. So, in that way, my review made sense to me as did the tone.
I do appreciate your comment and I feel this may have brought even more levity to the subject. My gratitude for reading! (And thanks to you, too, Tuffy.)
An interesting addendum to this, I've seen random banner ads for Scientology and Dianetics pop up on The Cult. I think Dennis told me they were randomly selected by Google AdSense. I can't imagine they get much traffic from here.
Uhh, yes. Right. Those ads are... uhhh... random.
(turns around, nodding at the man in the white suit behind him)
It does make people wonder how it is that there are people who can fall into cults so easily and seemingly without any pushing at all. casino online
I joined the Process Church in Chicago in the mid-seventies. It was a great three years. I never did go for the doom stuff, but the love and commitment were real, the joy and healing was strong and showed me that we have choices in life and that it doesn't have to be shit. They were a culture (real meaning of "cult") unto themselves, good people who took a real interest in others and never tried to "win" converts, who scorned materialistic attitudes and pathetic souls who they called "poor John Grey" whose "code" was "hypocrisy, mediocrity, blasphemy!" (lyrics from an old Process chant). Process music was original,devout, inspiring. I still have a hymnbook and some books around somewhere. The chapter house in Chicago was in the north end on Deming Place and it was always had a peaceful atmosphere, felt the moment you walked inside. The coffeehouse was in Old Town for awhile. Being focused on spirituality from a child, I flourished in the company of those who lived the love they preached! Once, I did a laying on hands healing after a service for a brother who was four hours in a waiting room for tooth pain. My consciousness soared. Touching him I felt the power flow and the pain left instantly. I played keyboard for the Sabbath Assembly, sang in the coffee house, danced to the Rolling Stones at the "Knees Up" on Saturday night, gave out free food, sold Process magazines on streets in Chicago, Ann Arbor and Milwaukee, became a Disciple, then a "Messenger." Once "christians" stormed the coffeehouse, shouting "Jesus this, Jesus, that!" When they got no reaction, the "christians" left. Another time, the incredible Mother Ophelia fearlessly faced down two guys intending to rob the free store. When Robert DeGrimston was dumped the spirit of the group changed. The love left; they became the "John Grey" they despised and I left. Which was a good thing because there were more beyond The Process I needed to continue to grow. But The Process definitely had something good, something called " divine love" which we all need right now.