Essay Four: Submerging the I
[size=4]Topic Four:
Submerging the I[/size]
[B]Recap of Chuck's Fourth Assignment by Vigorous Puppy[/B]
The fourth technique in Chuck’s Workshop is called Submerging the “I.” For all the immediacy and power of first-person narrative, one of the usual drawbacks is continually hitting your reader over the head with the word “I.” A narrator who goes on and on with “[B]I[/B] did this, then [B]I[/B] did that…” is likely to seem egocentric and to alienate the reader.
The alternative is simple. Keep the first-person immediacy, but eliminate most occurrences of the word “I” -- especially those that appear early in the narrative or that lead sentences and paragraphs. For a great example of a first-person narrative that holds back on revealing the “I,” check out a copy of Chuck’s story [B][i]Guts[/i][/B], which appeared in the March 2004 issue of Playboy magazine and also in a recent issue of the Guardian U.K.
For homework, dig up some of your own recent first-person writing. Go through and circle every occurrence of the word "I." Then, find a way to eliminate [i]most[/i] of them. Can you find a long paragraph that starts with "I" and has another "I" in almost every sentence? Chop it up. Find a way to present your narrative that is direct and immediate, without hitting the reader with a thousand little "I's"--those "I's" that keep saying: "this is not [i]your[/i] adventure, it’s [i]mine[/i]."
Remember, you don’t have to eliminate the “I’s” completely. If you do, it’s not first-person narrative anymore. So, it’s fine to have an “I” show up, say, once or twice in a long paragraph--especially near the end of it--as a sort of anchor. But somewhere floating above that anchor, there needs to be a sound and sea-worthy ship.
The challenge is always to invite the reader inside, first. Allow him or her to identify with your character and sail along with you. Make the narrator an interesting but, in a way, impartial character--a window onto the world of your story--instead of a lone egocentric little “I,” ranting at the world. When you submit your re-written passages as a workshop assignment, be clear in your summary about any points of comparison to your previous work. Write a clear, concise agenda for the kind of feedback that you wish to receive.
VP - Workshop Dog
Nice. I am very glad this is up, as many of our fresh-fish Cultists have been inquiring on this particular technique.
Strong ups, V!
Kabol
They caught me because of the blood on my fingers and between my teeth. I looked up from my meal on the tile of the kitchen floor and dropped her cold limb with a thud and minor splash and told them it wasn't me.
Erm, bump?
So, I've read the Q&A, and obviously VP's recap, but I'm still struggling with this. I've tried to check out submissions for the essay, but my computer is being uncooperative, and I want to kick it. (I'm even writing on paper, it's being that much of a craphead.)
Can anyone offer some more advice on this? With what I'm writing at the moment, there are about six "I"s in every paragraph. And they're sufficient enough for me to remember this recap and try to remove them. That said, it feels like I'm losing integrity when I'm doing so. Has anyone got any nice little examples for me to go over and try to emulate, getting rid of these "I"s? I feel like my writing is slipping into the passive when I try and get rid of them, or it's just full of "ing"s - dragging, swimming, breathing, flicking.
Most of you guys have been writing for years, and I'm still learning, so take a minute or two out of replying to PA to help me please? Thanks. :amish:
taking into consideration the idea that not every story will need this technique applied, always take into account if this is necessary for the current work. taking in all of that, lets delve further:
the story Guts was the example story for this essay. Chuck instructed that the writers utilize submergence through the beginning of the story, until at least the authority sets in. even the last few pages of guts uses the word "I" something like 72 times. so, mainly it's just the beginning of the piece..
also, something we brought up to the man was Clevenger's opening sentence of The Contortionists' Handbook, because the very first sentence starts out "I can count my overdose on one hand", which we brought up because it was one of chuck's favorite books at the current time and the novel started with that dreaded "I". He pushed that away, stated that the beginning of the handbook held such authority that the "I" didnt matter at all.
a number of us, including myself, initially thought this technique was simply applied so that we would used some big voice description to start out with, something that will promote the FEEL of the story or book. That's NOT it either. the whole idea is to help the reader become involved in the story, personally...
[b]/example
"well, i think that you should take into consideration the idea that not every story will need this technique. i think you should always take into account whether or not it is necessary for the current work. while you consider that, I'll go ahead and delve further.."[/b]
-see how this is self centered, self serving ? Even coming off as arrogant ? Chuck mentioned that when he reads a story and it starts out with I,I,I ... he gets put off, that it destroys the experience for him, because the writing seems self serving. personally, it was my belief that this particular essay weaned us from putting the reader off by not making the mistake of creating a story all about we the authors, a warning of how easy it is to come off as arrogant on the page.
hope this is helpful. hit back if you have any other concerns, please
kabol
They caught me because of the blood on my fingers and between my teeth. I looked up from my meal on the tile of the kitchen floor and dropped her cold limb with a thud and minor splash and told them it wasn't me.





Joined: 2003-08-29
From: