Access Denied
Minerva can't log in. Can't even see the site at all. She just gets this page.
So sorry to pester so much and it's not like I have a stupid little secret crush or anything. Just a concerned samaritan with living in my own nose.
screenshot is too small.
It's a white page that says "Access Denied"
What does it say in the browser?
What do you mean? Can't you magnify?
I'm trying to post it bigger but it keeps automatically re-sizing to that smallness.
"Wadface and Minerva"
INTRIGUE!
I'm trying to post it bigger but it keeps automatically re-sizing to that smallness.
It's fine, thanks. Tell Min to email me.
Okay, thanks. And again, sorry to bother so much.
It just means that she's been denied any sort of access.
I know, huh!
This is why we can't have nice things.
Aw, no shit?
Seriously though. What's happening here? Minerva has too much attachment here to risk something like making an alt or something. I think a mistake has been made.
agreed. Please reconsider. This is rationality speaking here.
Brentinlouis Wrote: What was that rule about being intentionally annoying?
Heeeeey! How's he doing anyway? Long time no see!
I'm going to spell out a few details so you guys can stop giving Frank a hard time about this. I'm not going to debate any of this tonight.
We IP banned some alt accounts the other night. Minerva's IP was the same IP as a few of these accounts. There are only 2 different scenarios here, folks.
- She was using alt accounts, which as has been discussed, is against the rules.
- She isn't the person using the alt accounts and whoever is was accessing the site from her IP address.
So which is it? If it was in fact, someone else, they are welcome to step forward. From an administrative end, you have to agree that we can't simply take someone's word on a topic like this, in this case, the evidence is not up for debate.
We haven't decided on the duration of the ban yet. End of story.
*sigh* well it's better than nothing. thank you.
Brentinlouis Wrote: What was that rule about being intentionally annoying?
Actually, it's a lot better than nothing. Thank you very much. And sorry for being snide.
How can you compare something as better and then a lot better than nothing? That's like saying Zero Eight Times is more than Zero Twice.
Imagine being homeless with no food. Then someone gives you an apple. That would be better than nothing. Or, imagine if they gave you burger, fries, and a salad. That would be a lot better than nothing. Right? 
"There’s no use in denying it: this has been a bad week. I’ve started drinking my own urine." -Patrick Bateman
right! he got it.
Brentinlouis Wrote: What was that rule about being intentionally annoying?
no. the apple would be better than nothing. the burger and fries would be better than the apple. and salads? Blechhh!
no. the apple would be better than nothing. the burger and fries would be better than the apple. and salads? Blechhh!
In the case that you were given the burger, fries, and salad, this would be instead of the apple. And the salad could be a dessert, in your case.
"There’s no use in denying it: this has been a bad week. I’ve started drinking my own urine." -Patrick Bateman
We IP banned some alt accounts the other night. Minerva's IP was the same IP as a few of these accounts. There are only 2 different scenarios here, folks.
- She was using alt accounts, which as has been discussed, is against the rules.
- She isn't the person using the alt accounts and whoever is was accessing the site from her IP address.
So which is it? If it was in fact, someone else, they are welcome to step forward. From an administrative end, you have to agree that we can't simply take someone's word on a topic like this, in this case, the evidence is not up for debate.
We haven't decided on the duration of the ban yet. End of story.
While alt accounts and banning is brought up...
My husband has an account here, though I don't think he has ever posted much, or maybe at all. I hadn't thought of it before, but I would hate to end up banned because he has an account using the same computer as me. So, just letting admin and mods know about that right now. Thanks.
Might as well delete this thread now, huh?
hahaha
Minerva's back. As you know, her IP was linked to two troll accounts. There was a good, but bizarre explanation. No, it wasn't DRUPAL. But it's up to her if she cares to elaborate.
well, i'm really glad. Thank you for sorting it all out!!
Brentinlouis Wrote: What was that rule about being intentionally annoying?
But why was she banned for?
ooh a bizarre reason. can we guess?
Minerva actually created the troll accounts whilst sleepwalking and remained unaware of them in her waking life until she was banned, so therefore she can not be held accountable for her actions
Minerva actually created the troll accounts whilst sleepwalking and remained unaware of them in her waking life until she was banned, so therefore she can not be held accountable for her actions
Hahaha. I like kit. You're a funny gal, I'm glad you returned.
what if it was Minerva from Earth-2 trying to communicate with the other side?
Earth Crisis: Cult Edition
and thanks Audrey 
Well, thats weird.