Neddy Nelson's Claims of Evidence of Time Travel....
It's been an long time since I've been here but I figured people would have discussed this already...
Neddy Nelson's Claims of time travel evidence all seem to be coming from the same book...
[url]http://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Archeology-Unabridged-Michael-Cremo/dp/0892132949/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-1633621-5756409?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1181717324&sr=8-1[/url]
In some cases all mentioned on one website.
-Sir David Brewster's metal nail (apparently it was gold)
-Mrs. S. W. Culp gold necklace
[url]http://www.skybooksusa.com/time-travel/experime/paleozoi.htm[/url]
-Hans Reck's Skeleton
[url]http://www.calarts.edu/~shockley/oh1.html[/url]
I didn't think they were 'real' the stories not the facts.
If they were ever to make a film out of Rant they should probably use that book as a prop.
I wonder if Chuck has it... I know I was 'given' (dollar donation) a book from some Hare Krishna at a street fair with some shit like this... probably from the same publisher, too. Bhaktivedanta Book Publishing.
"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own -- a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms." Albert Einstein
[QUOTE=izen;985071]this kind of shit is cool to me although i have to wonder how much of it is faked or the scientists just did their research wrong. still, i love the fact that there are still thousands of weird mysteries like this that we can't solve with all of our new technologies and shit. it should always be this way. mankind should never ever have full and complete knowledge of all things past, present, future or the beyond.[/QUOTE]
Why shouldn't mankind ever have full and complete knowledge? That seems to be an almost... cowardly statement to me. Knowledge is control, knowledge is power, and the will to power is one of THE driving forces of humanity. So why shouldn't we have complete knowledge? I understand that it isn't actually feasible that we COULD get complete knowledge, but wouldn't it make a nice goal to shoot for?
Mysteries are much more intriguing
Ok, good point. Mysteries [I]are[/I] intriguing.
this kind of shit is cool to me although i have to wonder how much of it is faked or the scientists just did their research wrong. still, i love the fact that there are still thousands of weird mysteries like this that we can't solve with all of our new technologies and shit. it should always be this way. mankind should never ever have full and complete knowledge of all things past, present, future or the beyond.