effing Loved It you naysayers

8 replies jump to bottom
redmeansg0
redmeansg0's picture
From: Alaska
Joined: 08/12/2007
User offline. Last seen 5 years 28 weeks ago.

i really don't understand all the whiney controversy. Rant was an incredible book. i found it insightful and brilliant.
also!
there is no such thing as a new idea anymore. anything that could have been thought or done, has. BUT it all lies in the individuals interperetation of someone else's ideas or philosophies.
Rant kicked ass. No one's holier than thou opinion is going to take that away from me.
besides, you all are here obviously because something about palahniuk's writing grabbed your attention. so step off your thrones.
having a muse is the opposite of being amused.
jealous much?

elegantly_bitter
Glibly undaunted
elegantly_bitter's picture
From: Melbourne
Joined: 05/28/2007
User offline. Last seen 2 years 3 weeks ago.

Wow. [B]That's[/B] telling the man.

__________________________

Photobucket

redmeansg0
redmeansg0's picture
From: Alaska
Joined: 08/12/2007
User offline. Last seen 5 years 28 weeks ago.

smells liiiike sarcasm?

elegantly_bitter
Glibly undaunted
elegantly_bitter's picture
From: Melbourne
Joined: 05/28/2007
User offline. Last seen 2 years 3 weeks ago.

Smile Big You're a quick one. You'll fit in nicely around here.

__________________________

Photobucket

chubbz
chubbz's picture
From: Western Hemisphere of Earth
Joined: 07/18/2005
User offline. Last seen 1 year 43 weeks ago.

Im way to high on my throne and I loved the book. Go ahead, ask around -- completely, with all my heart, loved it... Good to hear I aint the only one.

:fest06:

Jill's Tit
Jill's Tit's picture
From: BK
Joined: 05/05/2005
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 4 days ago.

Yeah. Anyway, Rant sucked.

Smile Big Jay kay, I just wanted to push buttons. But in all seriousness, Rant wasn't that spectacular.

SiLeNtPuNk
SiLeNtPuNk's picture
From: Greatarrr Londonnn
Joined: 06/21/2005
User offline. Last seen 5 years 34 weeks ago.

It didn't move me. I felt like it took to long to actually identify who the characters were in relation to each other. Also, having the seperate voices made it disjointed. I couldn't connect with anyone, I think this was a bad move on his part really. It was a really nice idea but I didn't even get 'hooked' until 3/4 way thru and then it was over really quickly after that.

luttleTinda245
luttleTinda245's picture
From: Louisville, Kentucky
Joined: 05/17/2005
User offline. Last seen 4 years 6 weeks ago.

i thought rant was stylistically interesting. yet, i was a bit confused with the liminal time travel but then again who isn't? cool concept though. i had just finish Lunar Park before I read Rant. the werewolf motifs used in both are disturbing yet parallel artistically. what great novel Rant is...

__________________________

I have this dream life where I get to be a celebrity but I get to navigate the world fairly easily because I'm always in character. ~dana carvey

mrh
mrh's picture
Joined: 09/27/2007
User offline. Last seen 5 years 17 weeks ago.

im massively surprised at the reaction i see with Rant. to be honest, i thought it was amazing. Its been a little while since i read it, but i remember drawing so many connections from it, to Chuck's other works, as well as things like Cats Cradle by Vonnegut, dont seem to remember them now, sure wish i had typed em up. maybe ill get back to it.

but anyway, the book was fantastic, i absolutely loved it.