The He-cession
IRRELEVENCE 2 TEH THESISES LOLOLOL
Seriously? Why men in particular? Oh you're right. Because my goals, as a woman, simply include baking pies and making babies? This comment is assinine and offensive.
Because it is relevant to the thesis, that is what this topic is about.
Men need validation for their existence. Men are not necessary.
Sexual reproduction came as the result as the need for genes to have variance. Variance is what allows for evolution.
The male gender is the mutant, it has less chromosomes than the female, (XY instead of XX).
Males needed to become stronger and larger than their female counterparts, prove themselves useful, become loners, or risk being consumed by the female. All of this is readily observable in nature, especially among mammals. The only specie wherein the and only the female provides nutrition to its offspring directly from her person (e.g. mammary glands).
Therefore, males need to validate their existence.
Nate and Ritt try to do it by being clever, in hopes that their personality would be attractive to their sexual counterparts (after all they could be homos).
After that though, you can see just how hollow and superficial it all is.
Wow. A jpg of Stephen Colbert with an amusing quip. That's comedy gold.
(*some disclaimers, 1. sociobiology theories are a dime a dozen, and cannot be verified conclusively, that is it's Achilles heel. 2. Women obviously have to verify their existence, but not to the extent men have to. Motherhood is far more substantive because of the emotional range of women as well as the biological miracle that is child birth.)
Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization.
My office is open to provide any necessary verification, M-F, 9A-5P. Appointment only.
Actually, this is quite sexist and I'm offended. I'm reporting you.
ok i'll admit that men have become less useful than they were in say...the old west or medieval times but we're not at all unnecessary. that's insulting to me and it's a fallacy. i as a man do not need to validate my existence, especially not with my job. that too is a fallacy. and i don't need to prove myself superior to women, that's just a joke. nobody likes those guys. you're way more misogynistic than i originally thought.
And maybe you'll cease to be so pathetic.
Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization.
If it is, prove it. Show me. I love to be PROVEN to be wrong, but I hate simply being contradicted.
I warn you, if you aren't up for it, then just leave the contradiction be as it is, because I will grill you.
Here's a homework assignment read:
And tell me what you think.
>>i as a man do not need to validate my existence, especially not with my job.<<
Not with your job, but with your OCCUPATION. There is a difference.
And when one's job is directly tied to one's existence (e.g. trading hours for money to buy food and shelter), then one's job is critical.
And when it is in short supply, because of an unholy union of hyper-competition among insecure peckers and social engineering by engorged vulvas...it's only a matter of time.
>>and i don't need to prove myself superior to women, that's just a joke.<<
I think you're equivocating explanations with excuses.
No one ever stated you must do any such thing.
>>nobody likes those guys. you're way more misogynistic than i originally thought.<<
I also fuck like an incubus.
Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization.
In the world I see - you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center. You'll wear leather clothes that will last you the rest of your life. You'll climb the wrist-thick kudzu vines that wrap the Sears Tower. And when you look down, you'll see tiny figures pounding corn, laying strips of venison on the empty car pool lane of some abandoned superhighway.
Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization.
LOL
what's that from. Is it Oh the Places You'll Go? I love that book.
I also fuck like an incubus.
Ah! I think I'm starting to see where you're coming from now! So please allow me to recommend you some readery.
In her first book, How to Be a Great Lover, bestselling sex educator Lou Paget showed women how to master a man's body. In her second book, How to Give Her Absolute Pleasure, Paget showed men how to please the woman they adore. In this, her third book, Paget shows both sexes how to bring each other to unimaginable heights of sexual excitement—together.
In The Big O Paget provides the most essential and cutting-edge information that will explain and show—with explicit step-by-step instructions—all you want to know about having an orgasm and giving one, including:
—The ten different ways that women and the seven different ways men are known to orgasm
—Tips on how to control the timing and frequency of orgasms
—Exercises to increase your body's sensitivity and suggestions for women who have never experienced an orgasm to explore and practice privately
—The real scoop on aphrodisiacs and other orgasmenhancers
—Emotional enhancers and inhibitors: the psychology of orgasms
—Physical obstacles to orgasms, including medications, diet, alcohol, and recreational drugs
—Historical and hysterical facts about orgasms
—The Kama Lou-Tra: Lou's own look at Tantric sex and the spiritual side of orgasms
Give it a whirl. Guaranteed it'll bucken you up and chill down your malice toward the man race, for speaking from experience after being in your position, I now fuck like an ARCHON!.
I also fuck like an incubus.
...so you wait until women are asleep and then you rape them?
since we're giving out homework assignments
Men weren't really the enemy -- they were fellow victims suffering from an outmoded masculine mystique that made them feel unnecessarily inadequate when there were no bears to kill.
In any given moment, a man’s growth is optimized if he leans just beyond his edge, his capacity, his fear. He should not be too lazy, happily stagnating in the zone of security and comfort. Nor should he push far beyond his edge, stressing himself unnecessarily, unable to metabolize his experience. He should lean just slightly beyond the edge of fear and discomfort. Constantly. In everything he does.
It's almost like you've taken fight club word for word and made it a literal guide to your logic. I'm tired of quoting you, so that "engorged vulva" comment - yet again offensive.
It's people with attitudes like yours that make sexism an EVER PRESENT issue. Had you come into the forums via an intro thread and maybe not been so defensive, perhaps this thread would've gotten a more serious response. I'd have loved to see where it went. You should know that you can't just mysteriously appear with a serious political theory and expect people to take you/it seriously - especially with the attitude you're carrying.
You somehow manage to come off as being sexist against both men and women. I am done.
I really think the worst thing about this thread is that any of us bothered to read it.
Also, who gives a shit if men are losing jobs. Everyone's losing jobs.
I now fuck like an ARCHON!.
You're still not as clever as Nate.
But nice try. Maybe you can get more material from Seinfeld.
Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization.
what's that from. Is it Oh the Places You'll Go? I love that book.
Yes. Yes it is. And I do too.
Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization.
You somehow manage to come off as being sexist against both men and women. I am done.
Do I contradict myself?
Very well I contradict myself.
(I am large. I contain multitudes.)
-- Walt Whitman "A song of myself"
Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization.
Damn you Walt Whitman! I-hate-you-Walt-freakin'-Whitman! Leaves of Grass my ass!
Kudos "big" S,
I think that is fine way to end the thread.
Wipe your ass with the Mona Lisa. Curse Walt Whitman and dance on his grave.
Tis apt.
Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization.
he's obviously kicking the gravestone, not dancing.
I now fuck like an ARCHON!.
You're still not as clever as Nate.
But nice try. Maybe you can get more material from Seinfeld.
Finally! Something we can agree on. Let the bridge building commence!
for reasons unknown to me, I decided to google the author of the article and found his website.
The guy wrote a book called The White Male Gap.
Come on... "Columnist of no consequence?" ... hardly.
Yeah, we get it, you're brilliant, brilliant, brilliant, and you fuck like an incubus.
It's Brock, everyone.
thanks for sharing.blackhawk tactical pants.
— Spambot
"I could have done worse!" exultantly cried the murderer Lebret, sentenced at Rouen to hard labor for life. — Félix Fénéon
Not enough CAPS.
Yeah, line breaks, punctuation, no caps...unless he's been honing his brockness high on a mountain somewhere, paring it down, keening the edge...nah, it ain't him.
I can lay you out and fill your mouth with your mother's feces...or we can talk.
Alright then if Im imparied tell me where I am wrong?
You posted the article, which means the burden of proof of this whole thread belongs on you.
You have no right to call anyone in this thread intellectually lazy if all you do is cite one source by a guy who complains that white guys dont get a fair shake.
Oh please Tyler Durden wannabe, indulge us with your vast superior intelligence, obviously we are all too stupid on this board to think for ourselves.
I give this thread's MVP award to Glamhoth, with Monkey grabbing the Cy Young...rookie of the year is up for grabs still...
Is Cy Young baseball? Should I know that? Does this make me a bad male.
He-cession...
I don't know what Cy Young is either. Sounds like a Korean rapper.
where's Brock Samson when you need him? The sad thing as far as this thread goes he's probably the closest thing to a real man's man if there ever was one.
Brock Landers, woman. Brock Landers. Requiescat in pace.
This thread never really got funny enough no matter how hard thestate tried.
This is why we can't have nice things.
Landers???
The reason why it hasn't been answered Nate, and please read this slowly:
It is irrelevant to the thesis.
Or Bush sized aptitude.
You're really not that clever.
And I doubt it's working out for you.
(There is the opinion that you are sub-par in this very community relative Nate, go pity yourself).
Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization.