____ vs. _____

39 replies jump to bottom
jd_james_427
jd_james_427's picture
Joined: 12/25/2007
User offline. Last seen 3 years 49 weeks ago.

Specify a fight and suggest who would win.  Provide an explination and if other people disagree well then they can but in and defend their point of view.  Better than polls which we cannot do, yes?

Batman vs. Ironman

Ironman would totally win.  As evidence, his armor is more powerful, he has much better firepower and he can fly.  Batman wouldn't even be able to compare.  What's he gonna do?  Batterang impenetratable armor?  I don't think so.  Good luck eating a missle Batboy.

__________________________

A man chooses. A slave obeys.

JKabol
yeah, we talked
JKabol's picture
From: le rock
Joined: 12/03/2003
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 2 days ago.

give him an electronic suit virus.  batman would win.  hands down, no question.

 

and chuck could so beat jerry springer's ass.  and my woman could beat up your woman..

__________________________

__________________________________

play hard, like it's work to be done.
stonecoyote
Why? Cos it's fun.
stonecoyote's picture
From: Anywhere I shouldn't be.
Joined: 01/11/2008
User offline. Last seen 2 years 48 weeks ago.

Maybe he could us his batmagnet to fuck up iron mans electronics. Then he cud turn him round, open his crap flap and give him some batty boy bum love. Batman wins and iron man offs himself when the rest of the avengers piss themselves and thor asks him for a date.

__________________________

There are no pacts between lions and men.

Giggan
Viva Voluntarisme
Giggan's picture
From: concord snh
Joined: 10/19/2006
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 6 min ago.

I had an idea for a thread like this with culties, but I figured it woulf lead to some bad blood and name calling. Hmmm...

Nancy Pelosi vs. Hitlery

Hitlery would throw haymakers, Pelosi would scratch and claw. Hitlery would lose a lotta skin, but she'd eventualy knock Pelosi unconscious.

__________________________

"They sold you hippies grunge, hip hop, now liberty activism."

http://freeconcord.org

nathaniel parker
Sprung
nathaniel parker's picture
From: Outer spiral arm of Milky Way
Joined: 06/24/2005
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 15 hours ago.

didnt you read Dark Knight Returns? Batman put the kibosh on Superman! He'd finish off IronMan in about 3 minutes

JKabol
yeah, we talked
JKabol's picture
From: le rock
Joined: 12/03/2003
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 2 days ago.

 

word, nate, word.  batman would so kick ironface's face in.  bats got that magnificent brain, man..

__________________________

__________________________________

play hard, like it's work to be done.
damien_mayfair
Dear Leader and Benevolent Light Bringer
damien_mayfair's picture
Joined: 08/20/2006
User offline. Last seen 4 weeks 1 day ago.

stewart vs colbert

tough. but i say conan o'brien.

JKabol
yeah, we talked
JKabol's picture
From: le rock
Joined: 12/03/2003
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 2 days ago.

stewie would kick bart's yellow ass

 

 

odd that i infinitely enjoy simpsons more than the griffins, though

__________________________

__________________________________

play hard, like it's work to be done.
ejrathke
radical
ejrathke's picture
Joined: 02/08/2008
User offline. Last seen 3 years 2 days ago.

conan wouldve won five years ago. hes losing it.

i say colbert by thumb war. stewart...he just sucks.

__________________________

my year in words
my year abroad

damien_mayfair
Dear Leader and Benevolent Light Bringer
damien_mayfair's picture
Joined: 08/20/2006
User offline. Last seen 4 weeks 1 day ago.

stewie's kind of whiny. my vote's on bart. yeah, conan's not as sharp as he used to but he's, like, seven feet tall. that's got to count for something. plus he has that mad glint in his eyes. and his red hair. yep, it's the hair.

nathaniel parker
Sprung
nathaniel parker's picture
From: Outer spiral arm of Milky Way
Joined: 06/24/2005
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 15 hours ago.

crunchy peanut butter VS creamy peanut butter?

damien_mayfair
Dear Leader and Benevolent Light Bringer
damien_mayfair's picture
Joined: 08/20/2006
User offline. Last seen 4 weeks 1 day ago.

creamy. i like my peanut butter texture to be consistent. otherwise, it'd be a jar of peanuts.

 

ejrathke
radical
ejrathke's picture
Joined: 02/08/2008
User offline. Last seen 3 years 2 days ago.

you know, the red hair might just push conan over the edge

 

a peanut butter war will never end. creamy or chunky. impossible.

creamy peanut butter doesnt have that nice chunkiness but the chunkiness of chunky fucks up bread when i try to spread it.

__________________________

my year in words
my year abroad

bearchaser
naked for your pleasure
bearchaser's picture
From: Purgatorio
Joined: 03/02/2006
User offline. Last seen 4 years 17 weeks ago.

jehovahs witness' vs. mormons

__________________________

ejrathke
radical
ejrathke's picture
Joined: 02/08/2008
User offline. Last seen 3 years 2 days ago.

i hope god smites both of them

but i think mormons win just because theyre creepier. too fucking nice and agreeable. makes me want to throw a brick at their face.

__________________________

my year in words
my year abroad

nathaniel parker
Sprung
nathaniel parker's picture
From: Outer spiral arm of Milky Way
Joined: 06/24/2005
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 15 hours ago.

The 1927 New York Yankees vs the 1972 Miami Dolphins

jd_james_427
jd_james_427's picture
Joined: 12/25/2007
User offline. Last seen 3 years 49 weeks ago.

People way overestimate Batman.  Tony Stark isn't a brainless schmuk.  It's not like he has no defenses against hacking.  Hell, Stark could hack into the Batmobile and drive it off a cliff before Batman could hack the Merk III.

I wanna see Mormons vs. Scientologists.  I have a personal theory that Mormons are happy that Scientologists came on the scene to make them look less crazy.

__________________________

A man chooses. A slave obeys.

JKabol
yeah, we talked
JKabol's picture
From: le rock
Joined: 12/03/2003
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 2 days ago.

 

i think scientology is a branch of the moron diocese

__________________________

__________________________________

play hard, like it's work to be done.
JKabol
yeah, we talked
JKabol's picture
From: le rock
Joined: 12/03/2003
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 2 days ago.

and i love advertisements

i will definitely click to receive my free e-book about the end times.

__________________________

__________________________________

play hard, like it's work to be done.
damien_mayfair
Dear Leader and Benevolent Light Bringer
damien_mayfair's picture
Joined: 08/20/2006
User offline. Last seen 4 weeks 1 day ago.

speaking of ebooks, kindle vs sony reader. i want to get one but kindle might be the way to go if they make it cheaper and people can hack it to read PDFs.

LeHaHi
TinTin-abulation
LeHaHi's picture
From: Wyoming/Seattle
Joined: 05/28/2006
User offline. Last seen 2 years 30 weeks ago.

harry potter Vs. Jane S.

Malfoy Vs. Corellion

Tough ones. I'd say harry would beat jane, duh, magic, but corellion would beat malfoy because he'd scare him so much.

I miss being around here. I need to visit more often.

__________________________


Brentinlouis Wrote: What was that rule about being intentionally annoying?

salamander
salamander's picture
Joined: 11/01/2007
User offline. Last seen 4 years 22 weeks ago.
bearchaser wrote:

jehovahs witness' vs. mormons

Mormons win by sheer volume. I think that bunch from Texas alone could win it with one unibrow tied behind their collective back.

__________________________

[img]http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/3071/minorthreathenrygarfielfv3.jpg[/img]

salamander
salamander's picture
Joined: 11/01/2007
User offline. Last seen 4 years 22 weeks ago.

 Stephen King's worst nightmare vs. Neil Gaiman's 

I think this could be tough, honestly.

p.s. anyone that cares: good news - Neverwhere is going to be a feature film. good news, indeed.

http://journal.neilgaiman.com/

__________________________

[img]http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/3071/minorthreathenrygarfielfv3.jpg[/img]

nathaniel parker
Sprung
nathaniel parker's picture
From: Outer spiral arm of Milky Way
Joined: 06/24/2005
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 15 hours ago.
nathaniel parker wrote:

The 1927 New York Yankees vs the 1972 Miami Dolphins

The 72 Dolphins would probably win if it was a versus based on sheer strength and size. Although Babe Ruth was a pretty big guy in his own right.

But if it was something to do with brains, like say a chess match, the 27 Yankees might have a chance. Surprisingly no, the 27 yankees were plenty stupid as well.

xec8
Godder than God
xec8's picture
From: The Pearly Gates
Joined: 04/26/2005
User offline. Last seen 24 weeks 2 days ago.

xec8 versus ODIN, GOD OF ROCK!

__________________________

thanks for sharing.blackhawk tactical pants.
— Spambot

"I could have done worse!" exultantly cried the murderer Lebret, sentenced at Rouen to hard labor for life. — Félix Fénéon

Nightrious
Nightrious's picture
Joined: 11/10/2003
User offline. Last seen 1 day 5 hours ago.

Batman always wins.

 

nathaniel parker wrote:

crunchy peanut butter VS creamy peanut butter?

 

Crunchy.

nathaniel parker
Sprung
nathaniel parker's picture
From: Outer spiral arm of Milky Way
Joined: 06/24/2005
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 15 hours ago.

Nightrious
Nightrious's picture
Joined: 11/10/2003
User offline. Last seen 1 day 5 hours ago.

Hell yes.

Giggan
Viva Voluntarisme
Giggan's picture
From: concord snh
Joined: 10/19/2006
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 6 min ago.

Mickey Mouse vs. Ronald McDonald.

Mick's got size, and he's probably faster because he doesn't eat shit like Ron. I see R McD fighting dirty though, maybe pulling it out with a nut shot.

__________________________

"They sold you hippies grunge, hip hop, now liberty activism."

http://freeconcord.org

Adelheid
A Twitch Upon The Thread
Adelheid's picture
From: Cannidah
Joined: 01/16/2006
User offline. Last seen 1 year 19 weeks ago.

Mac vs. PC. 

 

Mac would win no question right now, but a few years down the road, once Windows notices no one's buying their computers, they'll probably start to pull themselves together, come up from behind, and have a few more years in the limelight before they start to suck again.

__________________________

damien_mayfair
Dear Leader and Benevolent Light Bringer
damien_mayfair's picture
Joined: 08/20/2006
User offline. Last seen 4 weeks 1 day ago.

paris vs. london.

i'm gonna stop putting off a trip i've been wanting to do for a while and since rome and santorini are too expensive, these are two options i'm contemplating that are (slightly) less. i'd like to see the castles in london. i'm leaning to paris because of the louvre (and monuments too) but the language barrier is intimidating.

ejrathke
radical
ejrathke's picture
Joined: 02/08/2008
User offline. Last seen 3 years 2 days ago.

count chocula vs lucky, the lucky charm leprechaun

 

count chocula because frankenberry's got his back

__________________________

my year in words
my year abroad

TheJudasCow
Two Words. Sar. Casm.
TheJudasCow's picture
Joined: 01/29/2004
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 39 min ago.

zombies vs vampires

In a fair fight. No effing flying away and shut. Walking zombies instead of running zombies. To win the zombie would need to bite the vampire or the vampire would need to suck the zombies blood.

MULTIPLE OUTCOMES!!!
One! It could never happen because
A. Vampires would not need to kill a zombie because
1. They would use their fancy pants magic and fly away... or jump or whatever... flee...
2. By killing a zombie in the "normal" vampire way- (turning them) the vampire would kill himself
B. VAMPIRES ARE TECHNICALLY ZOMBIES AND ZOMBIES DONT KILL OTHER ZOMBIES
1. They are undead
2. They feed off the living
C. Given the parameters set forth, in an actual fight the zombie would always WIN
Two! If there were no rules
A. The vampire could use its superhuman strength to decapitate the zombie HOWEVER
1. ZOMBIES OFTEN TRAVEL IN "PACKS" AND AS SUCH COULD OVERTAKE EVEN A SEASONED VAMPIRE
2. VAMPIRES ARE SOLITARY CREATURES- THEY HUNT ALONE
3. A VAMPIRE WOULD NOT HUNT A ZOMBIE
B. IF THERES AN A THERE NEEDS TO BE A B AND I CANT THINK OF ANYMORE BECAUSE OF THE VODKA MY ROOMMATES HAVE FORCED ME TO CONSUME

__________________________

Photobucket

salamander
salamander's picture
Joined: 11/01/2007
User offline. Last seen 4 years 22 weeks ago.

 Michelle Obama vs. Bill Clinton - with knives.

__________________________

[img]http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/3071/minorthreathenrygarfielfv3.jpg[/img]

jd_james_427
jd_james_427's picture
Joined: 12/25/2007
User offline. Last seen 3 years 49 weeks ago.
TheJudasCow wrote:
zombies vs vampires In a fair fight. No effing flying away and shut. Walking zombies instead of running zombies. To win the zombie would need to bite the vampire or the vampire would need to suck the zombies blood. MULTIPLE OUTCOMES!!! One! It could never happen because A. Vampires would not need to kill a zombie because 1. They would use their fancy pants magic and fly away... or jump or whatever... flee... 2. By killing a zombie in the "normal" vampire way- (turning them) the vampire would kill himself B. VAMPIRES ARE TECHNICALLY ZOMBIES AND ZOMBIES DONT KILL OTHER ZOMBIES 1. They are undead 2. They feed off the living C. Given the parameters set forth, in an actual fight the zombie would always WIN Two! If there were no rules A. The vampire could use its superhuman strength to decapitate the zombie HOWEVER 1. ZOMBIES OFTEN TRAVEL IN "PACKS" AND AS SUCH COULD OVERTAKE EVEN A SEASONED VAMPIRE 2. VAMPIRES ARE SOLITARY CREATURES- THEY HUNT ALONE 3. A VAMPIRE WOULD NOT HUNT A ZOMBIE B. IF THERES AN A THERE NEEDS TO BE A B AND I CANT THINK OF ANYMORE BECAUSE OF THE VODKA MY ROOMMATES HAVE FORCED ME TO CONSUME

There are some problems with your analysis here.  Let me spread my geek wisdom:

1. Vampires would need to kill zombies because a zombie infestation would take away their food source (humans).  If there were only zombies, vampires would starve.

2. It's true Vampires are undead, but that does not make them zombies.  Vampires have free will and intelligence.  Zombies (common ones anyway) do not.

3. A Vampire can use weapons (guns, swords, artillery, hell even nukes if they needed to) and their speed/stregnth/possible telekinesis would never allow them to get outnumbered in a fight they didn't plan to win.  Also, Vampires can form covens and work in packs as well if they are so inclined.

4. An oversight you've made is that (according to some) vampires can create their own zombies from humans they have feed on and not changed to a vampire.  So a vampire can create an army of their own zombies to fight zombies if they were so inclined.

__________________________

A man chooses. A slave obeys.

ejrathke
radical
ejrathke's picture
Joined: 02/08/2008
User offline. Last seen 3 years 2 days ago.
jd_james_427 wrote:
TheJudasCow wrote:
zombies vs vampires In a fair fight. No effing flying away and shut. Walking zombies instead of running zombies. To win the zombie would need to bite the vampire or the vampire would need to suck the zombies blood. MULTIPLE OUTCOMES!!! One! It could never happen because A. Vampires would not need to kill a zombie because 1. They would use their fancy pants magic and fly away... or jump or whatever... flee... 2. By killing a zombie in the "normal" vampire way- (turning them) the vampire would kill himself B. VAMPIRES ARE TECHNICALLY ZOMBIES AND ZOMBIES DONT KILL OTHER ZOMBIES 1. They are undead 2. They feed off the living C. Given the parameters set forth, in an actual fight the zombie would always WIN Two! If there were no rules A. The vampire could use its superhuman strength to decapitate the zombie HOWEVER 1. ZOMBIES OFTEN TRAVEL IN "PACKS" AND AS SUCH COULD OVERTAKE EVEN A SEASONED VAMPIRE 2. VAMPIRES ARE SOLITARY CREATURES- THEY HUNT ALONE 3. A VAMPIRE WOULD NOT HUNT A ZOMBIE B. IF THERES AN A THERE NEEDS TO BE A B AND I CANT THINK OF ANYMORE BECAUSE OF THE VODKA MY ROOMMATES HAVE FORCED ME TO CONSUME

There are some problems with your analysis here.  Let me spread my geek wisdom:

1. Vampires would need to kill zombies because a zombie infestation would take away their food source (humans).  If there were only zombies, vampires would starve.

2. It's true Vampires are undead, but that does not make them zombies.  Vampires have free will and intelligence.  Zombies (common ones anyway) do not.

3. A Vampire can use weapons (guns, swords, artillery, hell even nukes if they needed to) and their speed/stregnth/possible telekinesis would never allow them to get outnumbered in a fight they didn't plan to win.  Also, Vampires can form covens and work in packs as well if they are so inclined.

4. An oversight you've made is that (according to some) vampires can create their own zombies from humans they have feed on and not changed to a vampire.  So a vampire can create an army of their own zombies to fight zombies if they were so inclined.

well said. i also had a problem with her post but decided to leave it alone. felt the world didnt need to know how much i love vampires and all that i know about them.

__________________________

my year in words
my year abroad

TheJudasCow
Two Words. Sar. Casm.
TheJudasCow's picture
Joined: 01/29/2004
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 39 min ago.
Quote:
  There are some problems with your analysis here.  Let me spread my geek wisdom:

1. Vampires would need to kill zombies because a zombie infestation would take away their food source (humans).  If there were only zombies, vampires would starve.

Ah duh. I realize that but it has no bearing on whether or not they will win in a fight against a zombie. I decided to leave that bit out.

Quote:
2. It's true Vampires are undead, but that does not make them zombies.  Vampires have free will and intelligence.  Zombies (common ones anyway) do not.

Zombies are undead. Vampires are undead. Vampires are zombies but zombies are not vampires.

Quote:
3. A Vampire can use weapons (guns, swords, artillery, hell even nukes if they needed to) and their speed/stregnth/possible telekinesis would never allow them to get outnumbered in a fight they didn't plan to win.  Also, Vampires can form covens and work in packs as well if they are so inclined.

Vampire weapons would be cheating. In an unarmed fight a zombie would so kick vampire ass. I believe I made that point. I think I made it again in the NO RULES part of my arguement. If a coven of vampires with weapons fought a pack of zombies the vampires would win. My fight was unarmed one on one.

Quote:
4. An oversight you've made is that (according to some) vampires can create their own zombies from humans they have feed on and not changed to a vampire.  So a vampire can create an army of their own zombies to fight zombies if they were so inclined.

Are you calling a familiar a zombie? I DO NOT MAKE OVERSIGHTS. Im talking zombie in the undead sense. Not a zombie in the mind control sense.

 

AND

If youve got a problem with my zombie logic fuckin say somethin to defend your precious "vampires" Fuckin pussy ass vampire bitches. Vampires my ass. Vampires. Pshhh.

__________________________

Photobucket

alex cassun
alex cassun's picture
From: Los Angeles
Joined: 09/14/2003
User offline. Last seen 4 years 11 weeks ago.

2007 Cult would totally destroy 2008 Cult.

Ironman
Joined: 04/09/2007
User offline. Last seen 4 years 7 weeks ago.
xec8 wrote:

xec8 versus ODIN, GOD OF ROCK!

 

IRONMAN VERSUS LOKI!!!

 

 

Stupid Phil I hate you.

Tao_Joannes
General Loser
Tao_Joannes's picture
From: Cocoa, Florida
Joined: 07/20/2008
User offline. Last seen 4 years 32 weeks ago.

Me vs. You

I'm gonna win. Because you're a little bitch and I'm a bad motherfucker. Remember that time when you were ten and fell down for no reason and busted your lip and skinned your knee? That was just the whiplash from the beating you're about to get. Seriously. You're fucked. You've got as much time as it takes for me to take off my earrings, do a couple pushups, and recite my signature "I'm about to beat your ass" monologue (roughly 35 minutes) to get the hell out of Dodge or sign over a Chrysler. Start countin.

__________________________

Photobucket