Skip to main content

Zombie Films... (Night Vs. Dawn)

After a good, long run, we have decided to close our forums in an effort to refocus attention to other sections of the site. Fortunately for you all, we're living in a time where discussion of a favorite topic now has a lot of homes. So we encourage you all to bring your ravenous love for discussion to Chuck's official Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram. And, as always, you can still post comments on all News updates. Thank you for your loyalty and passion over the years. These changes will happen June 1.
Tuffy the Dump Truck's picture Tuffy the Dump Truck
0 posts

Whoever started this thread is a zombie with no brain! Part 2:Electric Bugaloo. Directed by Brock Landers.

Okay, Brock's note on the "Good Films" thread got me thinking (a rare treat, indeed!) That, and this 28 Days Later hoopla, ties in nicely., I love zombie films as a genre in itself. ...But this is not the point of the thread now before you.

My point is this. Quite often, critics tout George Romero's Dawn Of The Dead as a superior film to his classic Night Of The Living Dead. Sure, Dawn is a satire of 70's consumerism, albeit a jokey, ham-fisted one (at a time when many films were already taking on consumerism), but Night takes on racism in a much more effective manner - and at a time when the issue of racism was [i]very[/i] touchy indeed. It is also scary, which Dawn is not. Add in the fact that it was shot on a much lower budget, in black & white, with cheaper (yet much more effective - read "realistic") special effects, had a better story, writing, acting, etc., and you have a better film.

Thoughts? Which do you think is better, and why?