Skip to main content

Social Contract Theory

After a good, long run, we have decided to close our forums in an effort to refocus attention to other sections of the site. Fortunately for you all, we're living in a time where discussion of a favorite topic now has a lot of homes. So we encourage you all to bring your ravenous love for discussion to Chuck's official Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram. And, as always, you can still post comments on all News updates. Thank you for your loyalty and passion over the years. These changes will happen June 1.

Even though this is the political subforum, I intend this more as a philosophy discussion. But obviously, take it anywhere you want.

In the Healthcare Deform thread, social contract came up kinda, and I figured a discussion on the subject was long overdue. What are your thoughts? Does 'the social contract' exist? It's the theory that turns governmental violence in nonviolence, so if it's valid, we're good, but if not, then we live in an unnecessarily violent society, and it would seem we would be morally obligated to stop interacting in such a way.

I'll save my ramblings until an idea is thrown out there. What's your take? Valid? Invalid? Is it logically consistent?