Skip to main content

Science Fiction/Scientific Elements in Rant

After a good, long run, we have decided to close our forums in an effort to refocus attention to other sections of the site. Fortunately for you all, we're living in a time where discussion of a favorite topic now has a lot of homes. So we encourage you all to bring your ravenous love for discussion to Chuck's official Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram. And, as always, you can still post comments on all News updates. Thank you for your loyalty and passion over the years. These changes will happen June 1.

So, I've thought a lot about this, and I've read the book twice now to get a better understanding. I found a couple of topics on here about the same thing, but it seemed people were just looking for answers. This is simply what I think of it, and I'd like to know what others think as well.

So, I think it's safe to say that the novel is operating on The Splintered Time theory, in which different decisions and events can cause splinters in time, creating parallel universes and such. This is the same theory that the Back to the Future movies used, but there is one MAJOR difference: The Grandfather Paradox. In the Back to the Future movies, should you go back and mess up your conception in any way, you will cease to exist. This does not apply in Rant. I find it interesting that Chuck decided to operate outside of The Grandfather Paradox, and that's what sort of drew me to the theory and had me researching it so much. Rather than ending your own existence by going back and messing up your own conception, you have the ability to become immortal by doing so. And, if you think about it in the mindset of time travel, it does make sense. You eliminate every direct ancestor you have, making it to where you are the only one. You are your father, grandfather, great grandfather, etc., and every woman involved is dead. You are the only thing tracing back to yourself, therefore making you immortal. I guess it's a bit of a stretch for most minds, but I can see it.
The other thing I find interesting is the use of liminal time. That moment right after your vehicle is hit, when everything is in slow motion, is when you can time travel. I can understand that completely, as in that moment, it seems that time has stopped, or at least slowed down considerably.
Of course, this is all assuming that you can grasp the concepts involved in time travel theory, but to me Chuck's is rather believable.